Reeve EAST SUSSEX EDITION Try Reeve
shire-reevesheriffSection 151 Officer, Councillors

Reeve

A shield crest showing an armoured knight holding a sword, over blue waves, representing Reeve
Built specifically for East Sussex County Council

Grounded in East Sussex County Council's own constitution.

This edition of Reeve incorporates East Sussex County Council's governing documents directly into its knowledge base: the Scheme of Delegations to Officers, the Cabinet and committee responsibility tables, the Procurement and Contract Standing Orders, and the Financial Procedure Rules — alongside the statutory framework that applies to all authorities.

When asked a threshold, approval, or delegation question, it answers at both levels: the statutory position, and the Council's own requirements where these go further.

Every response derived from the constitution carries a full citation — part, table, and rule — anchored to the consolidated constitution pack of 11 August 2026. Each answer therefore arrives with its own audit trail: officers can trace any statement back to the governing provision and verify it at source.

The service is deliberately conservative in scope. It does not speculate on matters outside its documented knowledge base — including current postholders or committee memberships, which change throughout the year — and instead directs users to the Council's own democratic services pages, where that information is authoritatively maintained.

Ask Reeve an ESCC procedure question →
7 May 2026 · all 50 divisions

The County Council election, in full.

Every division, every winning candidate, every vote count — researched directly from East Sussex County Council's own results pages and cross-checked against its member directory. This is the kind of primary-source detail Reeve's knowledge base is built from.

No party has overall control. Reform UK is the largest party with 22 of 50 seats — 4 short of the 26 needed for a majority. Who currently leads the council, and the Cabinet's composition following this result, are political outcomes decided after the count, not reflected here. Reeve will always direct you to the council's own democracy pages for anything this time-sensitive, rather than guess.
50
Seats contested
5
Districts
35–64%
Turnout range
Reform UK
Largest party · 22 seats
Reform UK
22
Liberal Democrats
13
Green Party
11
Conservative
3
Independent
1
Every bar is scaled to 26 seats — the majority threshold marked by the line at the right edge of each track. No party reaches it.

Eastbourne

9 divisions
DivisionCouncillorPartyVotesCastTurnout
DevonshireStephen HoltLib Dem1,5203,45335.29%
Hampden ParkColin SwansboroughLib Dem1,2752,86037.48%
LangneyAlan ShuttleworthLib Dem1,3962,80236.59%
MeadsJack MorrellLib Dem1,5534,52953.14%
Old TownPeter DiplockLib Dem2,4614,25951.74%
RattonColin BelseyConservative1,1743,62850.07%
St Anthony'sHugh ParkerLib Dem1,4723,57942.73%
SovereignRoy PechéReform UK1,6174,25245.89%
UppertonKathy BallardLib Dem1,8203,77444.11%

Hastings

8 divisions · turnout not published
DivisionCouncillorPartyVotesCast
Ashdown and ConquestAidan FisherReform UK1,2463,464
Baird and OreJo WalkerGreen1,4293,253
Braybrooke and CastleBecca HornGreen2,5774,311
Central St Leonards and GensingAmanda JobsonGreen2,5564,328
Hollington and Wishing TreeMark EstcourtReform UK1,0552,731
Maze Hill and West St LeonardsKaren SimnettGreen1,2183,523
Old Hastings and TressellJulia HiltonGreen2,0173,731
St Helens and SilverhillShaun DowlingGreen1,1523,938

Lewes

9 divisions
DivisionCouncillorPartyVotesCastTurnout
ChaileyCharlotte KeenanGreen1,8024,74353.13%
LewesWendy MaplesGreen2,6005,25563.76%
Newhaven and BishopstoneLesley BonifaceLib Dem2,0594,04651.29%
Ouse Valley West and DownsSarah OsborneLib Dem2,1344,04651.29%
PeacehavenTracy PedroReform UK1,3223,74641.44%
Ringmer and Lewes BridgeJohnny DenisGreen2,2635,38658.25%
Seaford NorthJane ReevesLib Dem1,6294,89955.85%
Seaford SouthCarolyn LambertLib Dem2,4394,44150.91%
TelscombeStephen ChapmanReform UK1,3123,97945.10%

Rother

9 divisions · Reform UK won 7 of 9
DivisionCouncillorPartyVotesCastTurnout
Battle and CrowhurstKathryn FieldLib Dem1,7363,82348.55%
Bexhill EastMartin KenwardReform UK1,2673,56241.59%
Bexhill NorthDonald WalmsleyReform UK1,0563,42240.95%
Bexhill SouthVictoria CarsonReform UK1,3334,26743.76%
Bexhill WestPete MorleyReform UK1,6475,00252.55%
Brede Valley and MarshamDaniel LachReform UK1,4834,14750.56%
Northern RotherPaul RedstoneConservative1,2163,76950.56%
Rother North WestMark AshdownReform UK1,1963,82450.82%
Rye and Eastern RotherDaniel BradleyReform UK1,1864,03151.01%

Wealden

15 divisions · Reform UK's strongest district (10 of 15)
DivisionCouncillorPartyVotesCastTurnout
Arlington, East Hoathly & HellinglyWilliam BooneReform UK1,7844,74246.40%
Crowborough North and Jarvis BrookCatherine FieldingReform UK1,8044,77651.59%
Crowborough South and St JohnsSarah JuryReform UK1,7424,80055.06%
Forest Row and GroombridgeGeorgia TaylorGreen1,8634,40854.28%
Hailsham MarketNeil CleaverReform UK1,4553,38638.20%
Hailsham New TownPaul SoaneReform UK1,1923,52440.16%
Heathfield and MayfieldAndy WoolleyReform UK1,4804,60550.97%
Maresfield and BuxtedChristina ColemanGreen1,7545,27156.84%
Pevensey and Stone CrossRoger LincolnReform UK1,4903,58545.45%
Polegate and WatermillMickey CairaReform UK1,4664,13843.05%
Uckfield NorthKelvin WilliamsLib Dem1,1133,53148.55%
Uckfield South with FramfieldPeter GriffithsReform UK1,3224,03850.91%
Wealden EastStephen PottsReform UK1,9255,14351.79%
Wealden North EastMichael LunnConservative1,4574,18951.17%
Willingdon and South DownsStephen ShingIndependent1,6184,51651.90%

Recent by-elections (prior to May 2026, historical context only)

  • Hastings — Ashdown and Conquest division: November 2025
  • Heathfield and Mayfield division: July 2023
  • Eastbourne — Meads division: August 2023

Two source discrepancies, flagged rather than resolved

  • The council's own member directory page header stated "51 councillors" but listed exactly 50 named councillors — matching the officially published total and this election's own district count. 50 is correct.
  • Two division pairs show identical "total votes cast" and turnout figures despite being different divisions: Newhaven and Bishopstone / Ouse Valley West and Downs (Lewes); Brede Valley and Marsham / Northern Rother (Rother). Possibly a coincidence or a publishing artifact on the council's own site — noted rather than corrected, since that is what the source itself states.

Sources: eastsussex.gov.uk/your-council/local-elections/elections/east-sussex-county-council-elections-may-2026 and its five district results sub-pages; democracy.eastsussex.gov.uk member directory. Compiled 18 September 2026 — a point-in-time record of the election result, not a live feed.

Councillor onboarding

You have been elected as a councillor. Congratulations!

Your induction consists of one day and one binder, questions remain and learning important procedure takes time. Reeve offers a reassuring perspective to councillors and employees alike by quietly unlocking nuances and answers to questions that they might be reluctant to ask, demystifying procedure and actual statutory mechanisms behind the conundrums at hand.

What they can and cannot do

A backbench member, a cabinet member and a committee chair have different powers, not different levels of the same power. Reeve grounds every answer in the actual mechanism — scrutiny committees, the power to call in a decision before it takes effect, full council votes, delegated authority — a full breakdown.

Declarable interests, before the first mistake

Disclosable pecuniary interests, predetermination and bias are the single most common source of real, reported standards complaints against new councillors — usually made in good faith omission, not misconduct.

Built for three duties

Different roles. Different statutes. The exposure is real.

Section 151 Officers, procurement officers and elected councillors carry genuinely different statutory duties.

Finance

Section 151 Officer / Director of Finance

This duty belongs to the S151 officer alone, under s.114 LGFA 1988, and gives the sole duty to report unlawful spending. The duties of a chief finance officer under subsections (2) and (3) are to be performed by the officer personally.

Procurement

Procurement Officer

Personal liability under the Bribery Act, the Fraud Act, ECCTA 2023 and the Crime and Policing Act 2026 — Reeve drills the red flags and the actual Procurement Act 2023 thresholds.

Elected member

Elected Councillor

Cabinet member or not, the powers genuinely differ. Reeve grounds every answer in the specific mechanism.

How Reeve actually works

RAG, grounded in a human-verified corpus.

Reeve runs on retrieval-augmented generation. Each query pulls matching records from a closed, versioned knowledge base, which are injected into the model's context window as grounding before it generates a response. The model still generates the answer — that's real inference, every time — but it's constrained to reason from retrieved, human-verified records rather than its own general training data.

Closed knowledge base, not the open web

Content lives as discrete, keyword-indexed records against a manifest — no live web access, no scraping, no third-party fetch at query time. Every record the model can reference already exists before the question is asked.

Human verification before ingestion

New records are drafted, then checked by a human against the primary source — legislation.gov.uk's enacted text, not secondary commentary — before they're added to the manifest. Nothing enters the retrievable index unverified.

Context injection, not free generation

At query time, matched records are retrieved and injected into the model's context window as grounding material. The response is generated, but constrained to reason over that retrieved context, not the model's own general knowledge.

Every record carries citation, source and date

Each manifest entry is stamped with its statutory citation and last-verified date. When the law changes, the affected record is corrected and re-dated, with the change tracked, not silently overwritten.

The machine is never allowed to sign. RAG generates the answer. A human-verified, dated corpus decides what it's allowed to generate from.

Just changed · in force 29 June 2026

Section 250 leaves no reasonable procedures defence.

The Crime and Policing Act 2026 came into force on 29 June 2026, replacing ECCTA's old section 196. Unlike Failure to Prevent Fraud under section 199 — where a genuine, tested compliance framework is a real defence — section 250 offers none at all. If a Section 151 officer or a head of procurement, acting within their actual or apparent authority, commits an offence, the council is automatically guilty of that offence too. No policy document stands between that finding and the council's liability — only the conduct itself, documented and independently evidenced at the time, is the defence.

Ask Reeve about section 250 →
What Reeve actually does

Training that produces real results

D

Statutory duty walkthrough

What you're personally on the hook for, under which specific provision and what a defensible paper trail actually looks like versus one that only looks adequate.

S

Real scenario training

Actual procurement, treasury and governance-failure scenarios drawn from real council cases — complexity builds progressively, you reason it through before the answer is revealed.

T

Documentable team sessions

Structured enough to deliver to a whole team, not just consumed solo — a named scenario, a discussion question, a clear right answer, built so the session itself is evidence of real training.

£

Treasury "Trust But Verify" calculator

A real deterministic calculator checking a broker's loan or option quote against direct central-government borrowing — Reeve narrates the result, never guesses the maths.

No account required — try Reeve on your own statutory question.

Try Reeve — app.escc.reevecouncils.uk